Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

The best thing for baseball? Parity.

Every year during the dog days of summer, my interest in baseball heightens. For a two week period when the daily high temperatures reach close to 100 degrees, I will sit down and watch multiple baseball games. At no other point during the year will I be able to sit and watch an entire baseball game without becoming bored. This year, however, may be different.

The reason? Parity.

The separation of "contenders" and "pretenders" occurs somewhere during the month of July, when those teams with legitimate playoff chances begin to distance themselves from those "flash in a pan" teams. As we approach that stretch of this season, it is easy to argue that 19 of 30 teams still have a shot at reaching the playoffs. Only 11 teams are 8.5 games or more behind first place in their respective divisions. Furthermore, there are zero teams with a minus-100 or worse run differential. Last year at this time, there were three. The "bad" teams are getting better, and the "best" teams aren't quite as good.

Major League Baseball has been dominated by teams that can spend millions and millions of dollars on top players. The phrase "buying a championship" is uttered in the same sentence with Yankees and Red Sox almost on a daily basis. But the Giants proved last year that parity is growing in baseball, and this season has confirmed that parity is indeed a trend.

The two most intriguing beneficiaries of this trend have to be the Pittsburgh Pirates and the Seattle Mariners. The Pirates have such a rich history of success and Hall of Fame players, yet many people couldn't tell you the last time the team made the playoffs (1992). Heck, many people couldn't tell you the last time the Pirates even had a chance to make the playoffs.

This year is different. Pittsburgh is three games out of first place in the Central Division, with only a minus-11 run differential. Three games back. As I type this, it's hard for me believe it. Even I have gotten used to the futility of the Pirates. Last year at this time, they were 17 games back with a minus-182 differential. Pittsburgh is a feel-good story waiting to happen - the entire country knows how bad they have been, and there's not a single person (outside of maybe St. Louis, Milwaukee, or Cincinnati) that doesn't want the Pirates to stay in the hunt for the remainder of the season.

The Seattle Mariners are similar to the Pirates, but with one added twist. Ichiro Suzuki is going to go down as one of the greatest hitters to ever play the game. He is a first-ballot Hall of Famer. Yet, the Mariners have stunk for the better part of a decade, and most of the country forgets just how good Ichiro is. The same can be said for Felix Hernandez, although his winning of the 2010 Cy Young award has brought him closer to household-name status. Even with two of the best players in baseball, Seattle has had trouble generating team success since their last playoff appearance in 2001.

Last year at this time, the Mariners were 14 games out of first place. This year, they are only three games back. Their run differential has shrunk from minus-68 to minus-11. They are the feel-good story of the American League, but more because of their current roster rather than their Hall of Fame alumni. Ichiro can be looked at the same way Dirk Nowitzki was looked at a few months ago - an aging superstar trying to cement his legacy by winning a championship.

So as the month of July begins, I will be holding my breath. I'll cautiously look at the boxscores in the newspaper each day. As the temperature rises, I will be hoping that the Mariners and Pirates and all of the other low-payroll teams can stay in the hunt and challenge the "big-spending" teams. If that happens, my annual two week baseball-watching period may just have to increase.

Thursday, June 16, 2011

The Curious Case of Bobby Lou

The Boston Bruins won the Stanley Cup last night, dominating game 7 of their series with the Vancouver Canucks 4-0. The Bruins physicality and depth ultimately wore the Canucks down, and goaltender Tim Thomas was an absolute wall for Boston.

Another factor that contributed to the outcome of the series was the inconsistency of Vancouver goalie Roberto Luongo. In games 1, 2, and 5 (in Vancouver) Bobby Lou surrendered only two goals against. In games 3, 4, and 6 (in Boston) Luongo allowed 15 goals.

The fact that someone could be so meteorically good one night and so terrible the next is a conundrum that ultimately motivates us to watch sports. On any given night, something remarkable could and probably will happen - especially in the NHL Playoffs. Luongo's inconsistency was an intriguing reason for neutral fans to tune in to the Stanley Cup Playoffs even before the Canucks reached the final (he was shaky in their opening round series against Chicago before regaining his form in the conference semis and finals.)

What is fascinating to me is the thought process of Bobby Lou after getting shelled in games 3 and 4. Did he say to himself "alright, I gotta do better than that, I'm capable of playing alot better" or did he say "welp, that sucked, good thing we have the home-ice advantage"?

The mind of LeBron James can be examined the same way. Was James trying to give himself a pep-talk in-between games of the NBA Finals? Did he let the insane amount of pressure affect his mood and ultimately forget about enjoying the moment? Did he underestimate the Dallas Mavericks?

Rory McIlroy can be viewed similarly. McIlroy went into Sunday at Augusta with a lead that quickly evaporated en route to a final round 80 that left many wondering when/if he could regain his confidence. Now, Rory is once again in the driver's seat - this time at the U.S. Open. I would be fascinated to read his mind and know what he's thinking - does he acknowledge the pressure, or attempt to brush it off and ignore it? Does he think back to his collapse at the Masters, or pretend it never happened?

We could continue this discussion an dive into the topic of psychology for hours. But ultimately, Roberto Luongo's inconsistent focus and play on the ice contributed to Vancouver coming up short. The real point of this discussion is the mental toughness that is required to play professional sports. To be a professional means to not only exhibit physical gifts, but also display a mind that can handle an extremely high level of pressure and stress. Luongo obviously came up short in the mental aspect of the Stanley Cup Finals.

Much like LeBron and Rory, I fully expect Bobby Lou to recover and become a stronger, more capable athlete mentally. Time will tell if that happens sooner rather than later. The real question - whether such growth will result in championships - remains to be seen.